Bristol Cars - Owners and Enthusiasts Forum  

Go Back   Bristol Cars - Owners and Enthusiasts Forum > Bristol Forums > 8 & 10 cyl Bristol cars

8 & 10 cyl Bristol cars Type 407 onwards - restoration, repair, maintenance etc

Mechanical v Electric fuel pump?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-22, 11:48 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default Mechanical v Electric fuel pump?

My car was fitted with an electric pump many years ago by a previous owner when the engine was replaced with a 1978 Dodge 360. I need to replace it. It had been VERY noisy and now it's failed. I had planned just buying a new electric pump and have just redone the wiring and fuel lines with that in mind. There are a bewildering array of electric pumps available and I have been trying to find the quietest that will do the job.

However, it seems that the quietest option could well be to ditch the electric and revert to mechanical pump which is, of course, how the car would have left the factory anyway.

So I am curious, why do owners fit electric pumps to replace the mechanical ones unless they have greatly uprated the power of the engine and need higher fuel flows or PSI? Is there some other benefit that I am not aware of?

David
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-22, 12:13 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 332
Default

The main advantage of an electric fuel pump is that you don't need to churn the engine over to fill the carb when the car hasn't been used for a while.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-22, 12:45 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David C View Post
The main advantage of an electric fuel pump is that you don't need to churn the engine over to fill the carb when the car hasn't been used for a while.
Ah, yes. I hadn't thought of that.

David
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-22, 02:55 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David C View Post
The main advantage of an electric fuel pump is that you don't need to churn the engine over to fill the carb when the car hasn't been used for a while.
I am away from the 3-4 months of the year. So this may be an issue but I suppose I can just disconnect the coil HT lead and turn the engine over on the starter to fill the carb float chambers then reattach the coil.

David
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-22, 03:05 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwomby View Post
I am away from the 3-4 months of the year. So this may be an issue but I suppose I can just disconnect the coil HT lead and turn the engine over on the starter to fill the carb float chambers then reattach the coil.

David
I don't think that would really help anything. The main problems with turning the engine over cold until fuel gets to the carb is wear on the starter and possible minimal cylinder lubrication.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-22, 03:15 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 332
Default

On further reflection it isn't just after long periods of standing. It gets fairly hot under the hood and fuel evaporates when the engine is shut down. An electric pump will also help with hot starts. I think the Filton engineers must have had good reason to replace the mechanical pump with the SU.

There are many opinions on the electric pumps. Several have become infuriated with the SU and gone to Holley, Mallory etc. The latter have good output and are reliable but have been criticised for being noisy and may generate more pressure than you need, lifting the needle valve and causing a rich mixture.

The main problem with the SU was its mechanical points. The AUF404 was double ended and had twice as much to go wrong. The later, solid state, switching seemed much better and was a fairly easy retro-fit. I modified my pumps in this way and was very happy with the result. New pumps with this type of switching are available in the UK for about £300.

If you do go for a racing style pump you need to make sure it is mounted on a suitably compliant base with flexible hoses so vibration isn't transferred to the car.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-22, 07:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK
Posts: 275
Default Mechanical vs electric fuel pump

I fitted a red top Facet to my 407 20 years ago, it failed this year after 56,000 miles. I fitted a one immediately.
The Facet came with a pressure regulator which I soon found the most suitable pressure for my 313 engine. I mounted the pump under the off side wing near the servo. It is mounted rubber insulation bolts so the tap, tap tap noise is hardly heard on tick over. My car is still positive earth, Facet used to do both positive and negative pumps. They now only offer negative but it is a simple job to wire it up for positive earth.
It is an almost instant start as mentioned not turning over the starter motor.
I can see no reason not to fit, just makes life simple.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-22, 07:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Simmons View Post
I don't think that would really help anything. The main problems with turning the engine over cold until fuel gets to the carb is wear on the starter and possible minimal cylinder lubrication.
Good point, John. Thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David C View Post
On further reflection it isn't just after long periods of standing. It gets fairly hot under the hood and fuel evaporates when the engine is shut down. An electric pump will also help with hot starts. I think the Filton engineers must have had good reason to replace the mechanical pump with the SU.

There are many opinions on the electric pumps. Several have become infuriated with the SU and gone to Holley, Mallory etc. The latter have good output and are reliable but have been criticised for being noisy and may generate more pressure than you need, lifting the needle valve and causing a rich mixture.

The main problem with the SU was its mechanical points. The AUF404 was double ended and had twice as much to go wrong. The later, solid state, switching seemed much better and was a fairly easy retro-fit. I modified my pumps in this way and was very happy with the result. New pumps with this type of switching are available in the UK for about £300.

If you do go for a racing style pump you need to make sure it is mounted on a suitably compliant base with flexible hoses so vibration isn't transferred to the car.
Thanks, David. FWIW attached is a pic of what was in the boot until I took it apart to set it the right way up! It's a Mallory 140 and supposedly very quiet. Since being turned the right way up, it's only managing 2.5PSI !!!!! I'd just put in another except it's rather expensive and overkill for this engine anyway.

I have been looking to see if I could fit a mechanical and it seems unlikely anyway. My car has its alternator sat on that side of the engine and there's less than 3" clearance between it and the blanking plate over the mechanical pump location.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Challacombe View Post
I fitted a red top Facet to my 407 20 years ago, it failed this year after 56,000 miles. I fitted a one immediately.
The Facet came with a pressure regulator which I soon found the most suitable pressure for my 313 engine. I mounted the pump under the off side wing near the servo. It is mounted rubber insulation bolts so the tap, tap tap noise is hardly heard on tick over. My car is still positive earth, Facet used to do both positive and negative pumps. They now only offer negative but it is a simple job to wire it up for positive earth.
It is an almost instant start as mentioned not turning over the starter motor.
I can see no reason not to fit, just makes life simple.
Thank you, Nick. Facet are a strong candidate but my car is all wired and plumbed for the pump to go in the boot sitting marginally below the level of the fuel tank bottom. I think I'll have to stick to that setup for now (mostly because of the wiring changes I'd need to make) and will let you know what pump I install and how it sounds!

David
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Fuel pump (1) (Copy).jpg (109.9 KB, 19 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-22, 12:19 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default

I have ordered a Mallory Comp 70 for the car.. I'll update after I fit it.

David
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-22, 04:26 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK
Posts: 275
Default Electric Fuel pump.

David,
I do not see a pressure regulator on your Mallory which appears to be upside down. The Facet regulator is not their own I think it is a Purolator and could be fitted to increase / decrease your pressure.
Good luck and would like to hear how you get on.

Nick
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-22, 05:41 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Challacombe View Post
David,
I do not see a pressure regulator on your Mallory which appears to be upside down. The Facet regulator is not their own I think it is a Purolator and could be fitted to increase / decrease your pressure.
Good luck and would like to hear how you get on.

Nick
LOL - yes, Nick, it WAS upside down. That's the way it was when I got the car and it was noisy, so I re-installed right-side up it after taking that pic. There is an external pressure regulator - it's the smaller canister you see in that picture - but with or without it, that pump is now only giving 2.5PSI and some occasional pulses of more.

David
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-22, 08:58 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 70
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwomby View Post
. it's only managing 2.5PSI !!!!!
I don’t understand why you would need any more - that’s around the same pressure as is produced by the SU pumps on the later models. What you need is volume, which is not the same as pressure. Bear in mind that the Carter Carb literally just dumps the contents of the float chambers straight into the manifold on kickdown and you’ll see what I mean.

I found the SU double ended pump that I used to replace an extremely noisy Facet to excellent. Quiet in that it was inaudible with the engine running, even at tickover, but just loud enough to give you that reassuring tick tick as you turn the ignition on. Mine did me 20 years and never gave me any trouble at all.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-22, 09:24 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Morrall View Post
I don’t understand why you would need any more - that’s around the same pressure as is produced by the SU pumps on the later models. What you need is volume, which is not the same as pressure. Bear in mind that the Carter Carb literally just dumps the contents of the float chambers straight into the manifold on kickdown and you’ll see what I mean.

I found the SU double ended pump that I used to replace an extremely noisy Facet to excellent. Quiet in that it was inaudible with the engine running, even at tickover, but just loud enough to give you that reassuring tick tick as you turn the ignition on. Mine did me 20 years and never gave me any trouble at all.
Thanks for your input and you may well be right, Roger, but I ordered a replacement pump anyway. The one on there should have been putting out 12PSI and 140 USgph. For what it's worth, my carb isn't the Carter - it's a Summit Racing M08600VS. Also, I tested the pump later to empty the tank. The flow from it seemed rather pathetic but I did not measure it except that it took over 5 minutes to fill a 5 US Gallon container so approx. 48 Impgph? That almost certainly would have been adequate but I decide to replace it anyway. The SU pump was tempting but a bit pricey here plus the one I have ordered physically fits the mounts of the one I have removed.

David

Last edited by dwomby; 09-01-22 at 01:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-22, 10:36 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 84
Default

I agree with Roger on all points. As noted in one of my previous posts when my SU stopped working, as a temporary measure I fitted a Facet pump. It did the job but I disliked the noise it produced, despite the insulating and sound proofing I did during its installation.

David W: have you checked the petrol supply pipe to the carburettor which runs along the chassis? The location of the fuel pipe is conveniently situated for it to be trapped by an unsuspecting mechanic when jacking up the car.

Irrespective of what pressure you have in the pump, the flow will be reduced if the pipe has been squashed or deformed.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-22, 01:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DODD View Post
I agree with Roger on all points. As noted in one of my previous posts when my SU stopped working, as a temporary measure I fitted a Facet pump. It did the job but I disliked the noise it produced, despite the insulating and sound proofing I did during its installation.

David W: have you checked the petrol supply pipe to the carburettor which runs along the chassis? The location of the fuel pipe is conveniently situated for it to be trapped by an unsuspecting mechanic when jacking up the car.

Irrespective of what pressure you have in the pump, the flow will be reduced if the pipe has been squashed or deformed.

Brian
I have the car on stands at the moment, so I will take the opportunity to inspect the full length of the fuel supply pipe. Thanks.

I really hope to get this car back on its tyres by the end of the week even if I don't do all the little jobs that I had planned while it was on stands. This time of year is best for driving fun here in Florida!

David
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-22, 02:26 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 10
Default

An electric pump will keep running as long as it has power even if the engine has stopped because the fuel line has ruptured...
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-22, 02:38 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roybatute View Post
An electric pump will keep running as long as it has power even if the engine has stopped because the fuel line has ruptured...
True but there are a couple of preventative systems: you can fit an oil pressure switch that cuts power to the pump if there's no oil pressure; and, you can install an inertia cutoff switch that cuts power if the car experiences an impact. I have the latter installed but plan adding the oil pressure switch at next oil change.

I don't think any car with an electric pump can be considered safe without at least one of those cutoffs installed.

David
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-22, 03:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 332
Default

That's an interesting idea but needs some refinement. If you just use a pressure switch then you will get no fuel until you crank long enough to build oil pressure. A less ideal solution than a mechanical pump.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-22, 03:21 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida / Nova Scotia
Posts: 261
Default

I agree reverting to the original mechanical pump has advantages but to fit one back in my car now would be a big job and I want it on the road. I'll add it to my list of future 'improvements'.

David
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 14-01-22, 08:53 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,170
Default

I've had a Carter fitted in the boot of my 411. It makes enough noise so you can hear it fill the carb when you turn the ignition on, but once the engine is running you can't hear it. However, they seem to be unreliable and don't like being unused for long periods of time. My first one seized and just got hot - not ideal for a petrol pump, and it's replacement doesn't appear to working properly either. So I can't recommend them.

As for pressure, I don't know what the 313/318 engines need, but the 411 needs 5-5.5 PSI; I have a pressure regulator mounted inline next the carburettor unfortunately I can't tell you what flow rate is required.

As an aside, I once saw a 412 which was fitted with an electric pump which was used just to prime the carburettor before starting by pressing a button in the cabin, but still used the mechanical pump when running.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 AM.


This is the live site

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2