![]() |
![]() |
|
Bristol News & Other Bristol Discussion About the company, clubs, car owners, and Bristol discussion not specific to the 6,8 or 10 cyl cars. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
![]() Dear All,
I had the pleasure of visiting the Bristol Kensington showroom in November 2003 having a long conversation with Mr. Tony Crook who introduced me to the philosophy behind Bristol Cars, further enhancing my passion and knowledge of the brand. In my recently launched activity of freelance car stylist, I worked out a proposal for a reshape of the Bristol Blenheim bodywork, which I called the Brabazon, in order to align the main Bristol product line to the new styling direction inaugurated by the Fighter supercar. This project does not have affiliation with Bristol Cars Ltd, although this would be welcome! Please visit my website www.bertolio.it and let me know your opinions. Best Regards Giacomo Bertolio |
|
|||
![]() If one looks at the evolution of Bristol style, one notes that it began by
imitating the BMW. Then with the 401-403, it took on a most elegant design, with curved form resembling a snow drift after a hard-wind blizzard. The 404-405 emerged more matcho, taking on an aero snout, form-follow-function that slowly grew more refined up to the 411 after the unfortunate low point of the 408. Then shall we say, Mr. Crook's singular personality began to become more pronounced, especially in shaping the nose, as the cars became remarkably less beautiful. By 2003, Mr. Crook's singularity gave us, well, how would I say this? Perhaps Mr. Bertolio's design accurately reflects Mr. Crook's design ideas in his later years. As with all companies whose owner looms large, customers must take the good (the car) with the bad (some of its visual design aspects). The evolution of the current Blenheim is a case in point where the company itself advertises the "Blenheim 3 Frontal Restyle" which "transforms your cars look and adds value". This can be attributed to a new owner, younger, with his finger on the pulse of his customers. Bristol Cars is doing rather well with their designs, in my opinion. Now, if they would come out with Bristol's answer to the Tesla... As Mr. Bertolio's car for Bristol's future, it seems to be a Bentley nose grafted on an AC Bristol type rear, and a high dashboard as in a Piper Archer. Since he asks for opinions, rather than praise... Mr. Bertolio, it is not a winner. In feeling it resembles the 1949 Triumph 2000 that sought to exude the elegance with its wide wings and ostentatious design features, but ended up looking like a trollup with bad makeup and too much hair. I say this with the utmost respect for your efforts, but before launching a new career, perhaps a few years in apprenticeship to Pininfarina might be in order. Claude |
|
|||
![]() Oh dear,
I should have known better, well named. The "Brabazon" was an ill conceived project at the wrong time. It was to have catered for a class of person the 2nd world war had made redundant. It had an out dated method of propulsion was inconsidered for its time, only got of the ground to be forgoten except for being one of Aviations greatest failures. I am with Philippa, even though I like my 407 better than my short lived 412, but a Fighter I would love to drive and be seen in any day, I think the Brabazon best left to the history books. The car proposed car design sold to China. I would rather like the next Bristol (an open top preferably) called a Bulldog. Sorry, but let Bristol progess slowly but surely with wonderful shapes recalling the past and paying complements to the old names that were deserved. Silverton's, you are not doing a bad job, keep up the good work! Nick Challacombe, old git and proud of it! |
|
|||
![]() Dear all,
thank you for the clinic test. At least it seems this is the most animated thread on bristolcars.info so far! I obvioulsy accept all criticism and can agree with some but please understand that when a new design is proposed styling cues tend to be exaggerated. When cooperating with the manufacturer things usually get toned down, sometimes for good, sometimes for bad. Just think about the difference between the first scale model of the Fighter and the end result. Brabazon can appear too bulky in places but we have to accept cars are growing bigger, not only because people is getting taller and larger but also because safety elements, ancillaries and crash test requirements require larger bodyworks. Think about pedestrian crash regulations with the minimum distance from engine block to the bonnet, or the mandatory detachable front in impacts. For the user named Potential, there is a big difference in a rendered 2D sketch as in the reported tutorial and a full 3D virtual model as the Brabazon. For 406special, I personally do not like some of the Chris Bangle style but he definitely contributed to the big sales success of BMW. Thanks Kevin Howard for signalling the Firefox3 problem. I completely redesigned the graphics in order for the website to be quicker and clearer to read with all browsers. Finally, in defence of Mr. Crook I must say I arrived in 2003 well past closing time at the Kensington showroom (not even dressed as an Arab prince), he opened the door for me and my wife and we talked cars for over one hour. He was very enthusiastic about both Fighter and Blenheim, we talked about homologation problems, market for the Fighter, Ferraris, Bentleys and so on. He seemed he did not want to let us go! So if Mr. Silverton asks for a design give him my telephone number. Regards Giacomo Bertolio (aka Big Coolie Motor) |
|
|||
![]() Giacomo, you're a gentleman and a good sport (as we say in Australia).
Even allowing for modern crash worthiness design, it would be wonderful to see the earlier classic Bristol (405/404/407/411) influences, especially if you want the Brabazon nose cone effect (see 404-407). Less is often more and in the rear of your design you have exaggeration and it lacks elegance (again check out the rear of all earlier Bristols pre-603). Clyde |
|
|||
![]() It's nice that Sr Bertolio is interested in our motor-cars, and, from looking at the other cars on his website, he does have great talent. However, the Brabazon seems like the cars I drew during boring geography lessons on scraps of paper.............I couldn't see over the bonnet of those either ! I also opine that the Brabazon looks a bit too much like the Rover Turbine car of 1956 - repeat 1956 ! I have uploaded a picture as an attachment. Sorry to be so negative, Sr Bertolio. Try using a 411 as a basis.........everyone loves those.
|
|
|||
![]() Giacomo, please be aware that Bristol enthusiast's tolerance for quirky designs does have it's limits!
The Brabazon is a non starter for me. I think the design is particularly ugly at the front and the body looks bloated and too big for the chassis. Also, I think you should take a look at how your site renders in Firefox3. Philippa - I don't think anyone has said the 412 is "ugly", just that it reminds people of a fridge ![]() Kevin PS. To my mind colour makes a huge difference to my opinion of the 412. I think they look much better in mid to darker colours. |
|
|||
![]() Dear Giacomo,
The best view is from above but even from here is is too bloated especially across the front section. The whole car appears too bulky and although you retain lots of glass with a light and airy cabin, the external scalloping of wheel arches simply looks ugly and out of character with the car. It probably robs the spare wheel spot of valuable space (have you ever looked inside the wheel arch compartments of a Bristol?). As others have suggested, start with a 410/411 and work your ideas on improving the front and rear details. Having a narrow track makes curves on the side of body challenging especially when one considers the limited side to side space inside a Bristol. My 406 from the rear reminds me of a Bertone designed Alfa 105 series with a sloping pert behind. The alteration I am having done to the front is merely to remove the ugly Lucas stuck on direction indicators (blinkers) whilst engendering a hint of 1950-60's Alfa Guilia air intake mixed with DB4 side and blinker lights (separate). Like others, I think the RR slab front end far too blunt and square. If you want to hint at aeronautical past, then more aerodynamic curves and shapes should be employed. Don't Bangle-ise it either. The rear should be less fussy as well. I wouldn't bother with automating rear quarter lights as these are best handled by hand (if anyone is in the rear). |
|
|||
![]() OK so I, like many others, was quick to reply after seeing Giacomo Bertolio's "Bristol design". But then I started to think ............ might this be a hoax? Well he, the author, did say that a chat with Mr C at Kensington "further enhanc(ed) my passion and knowledge of the brand." I remember my first visit to Kensington and my chat with Mr C had the opposite effect! So perhaps it is a hoax?
If it is a hoax then perhaps his name "Giacomo Bertolio" is an anagram. I came up with 3 possible solutions, but wondered if anyone else could help with a solution? "Giacomo Bertolio" yields:- 1) A Robotic Ego Limo 2) A Big Coolie Motor 3) Ciao Big Ole Motor |
|
|||
![]() I think that if anyone wants to base designs on Bristols, then they are to be encouraged - on the basis that there is no such thing as bad publicity. I think we have been rather rude to Giacomo - keep up the good work! Not too keen on this particular design, but the Jana 08 shows definite potential. And thanks to whoever it was that mentioned the gas turbine Rover - that's exactly what it reminded me of, but I couldn't place it.
Andy Bernard |
|
|||
![]() Andy Bernard is correct; we designers of the future should be encouraged.
I would welcome other members' opinions on the attached car designs for the proposed new Bristol Titanic. These are the shortlisted ones. Perhaps you could all help me choose which one to make into a prototype. Mr Silvertongue has told me he is very keen to see the chosen design so he can begin applying Bristol traditions towards its final form. Richard |