Bristol Cars - Owners and Enthusiasts Forum  

Go Back   Bristol Cars - Owners and Enthusiasts Forum > Bristol Forums > Bristol News & Other Bristol Discussion

Bristol News & Other Bristol Discussion About the company, clubs, car owners, and Bristol discussion not specific to the 6,8 or 10 cyl cars.

Words in the July 2011 issue of Motor Sport

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14-06-11, 11:29 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,170
Default

A copy of a Bristol body in fibreglass, on a non original chassis and drivetrain is not a "replica", it's an imitation. It's definitely not a Bristol in any way. It has zero Bristol "DNA" in the classic car sense.

But why do this anyway when you can still buy a real original Bristol at a reasonable price?

I saw a funny thing at the weekend. A US built Ford Taurus with oversized Mercedes badging and hideous non original Mercedes wheel trims. The clown who did this had removed all the Ford badging but obviously couldn't bring himself to remove the Ghia badges from the wings! Oh, it had the number plate "BAD9" which was undoubtedly worth more than the car itself.

Why not do something like that Ron. Just get some Bristol badges and stick them on some mass produced piece of junk. It would be much cheaper than making a fibreglass copy of a 409 and so few people in the US would have even seen a real Bristol it wouldn't really make much difference
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 14-06-11, 08:25 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 183
Default

Surely it is the chassis that is the common DNA to all Bristols (other than the Fighter). Why not start with the chassis and drivetrain from your favorite Bristol driving experience package and build a one off body to your own design on it? Jeff Marsh is about to offer this option from his new enterprise in Bristol I believe.

I did wonder if it would have been a good product line for Bristol to offer before the big change. You buy a complete rolling chassis, and then you get your design built in CAD so you can see what you are getting and can tweak it accordingly, a buck gets built and the body is coachbuilt in traditional British manner for you. Porsche and Ferrari do this, for a fee of about a million quid, but I suspect that in the real world a Bristol of your own would cost 150 to 200k and would last your lifetime.

Personally I would avoid fiberglass on any car that is intended to have a prestige element, the big trend in replicas now seems to be aluminium due to reductions in tooling costs and the wider availability of superforming for small series production as well as customer demand. This further reinforces the need to avoid fiberglass which is very much associated with kit cars. It is a bit of a false economy and it just doesn't provide a class A paint finish which is one of the other defining features of Bristols.

P
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 15-06-11, 11:45 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Monschau/Germany, near the Belgian border
Posts: 107
Default

I think Bristol would have done this within the limits of their possibilities if you had asked them.
For instance the body panels of the Blenheim 4 discussed here in the forum also largely differ from the standard model. Or look at the Speedster/Roadster.

And it's much easier to do on a separate chassis than with a monocoque construction.
In fact this was standard practice for luxury car manufacturers before World War II.

Regards,
Markus

Last edited by Markus Berzborn; 15-06-11 at 11:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-11, 01:25 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,170
Default

As one hand built car manufacturer fails another flourishes.

Bufori
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-11, 02:38 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin H View Post
As one hand built car manufacturer fails another flourishes.

Bufori

Gackkkkkk!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-11, 01:24 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browning l View Post
Gackkkkkk!
Bufori owners may say the same about your Bristol 603, but that's not the point.

The point is, they make hand built cars from scratch, to individual specifications using modern materials and technology. Their power train even comes from the same company as Bristol's did.

The difference is Bufori flourished as Bristol faltered, after 60+ years in business. The reasons why may be worthy of consideration.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-11, 05:18 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Posts: 188
Default Bristols, new and old

When it comes to cars, there are so many opinions going around that one wonders why people even bother to take on a brand and do their damnedest to stick with it. In Ameria, the names of cars that have come and gone number in the thousands. When automobiles were new to the scene, it seems that everyone with an idea and a little financing tried their hand at building cars. And, just a quickly as a 'new' name appeared on the scene, a few others bit the dust. Like Aston, Bristol was fortunate for a few years to find a patron or two to keep the marque alive. When the money ran out the game was over. I think most of us could name the many different brands that were some of the best that could be offered at the time. For various reasons, they died away.....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:50 AM.


This is the live site

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2