![]() |
![]() |
|
Other Bristol engined cars Arnolt, AC, Frazer Nash, Cooper, Lister, Lotus, Tojeiro |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
![]() There's a nice article in the December 2010 issue of The Automobile magazine about a Bristol "special" created by Andy Mitchell of Mitchell Motors in the UK, 6 pages including lots of pictures.
They call it a "special Bristol" but it's not really a Bristol in the real sense because it doesn't use a Bristol chassis. It does however have a Bristol engine, albeit with all new internals, plus Bristol suspension with modified axles to allow fitting of Aston DB4 wire wheels. |
|
|||
![]() Interesting that it's called a Bristol on the insurance database even without a Bristol chassis. Is it the chassis or the engine that makes it a Bristol ? It seems the engine ! No doubt quicker than the Arnolt kits.
JSC577 is on the Motor Insurance Database today The details on the car are: Vehicle Make/Model: BRISTOL SPORTS Vehicle type: PRIVATE CAR |
|
|||
![]() I see Greg. Or do I?
Doesn't a car (the chassis at least) have to have been a Bristol at one time in order to call it a Bristol Special? I see the article does later refer to it as a Michell Special, but then why not just a Mitchell? According to a website I just found JSC 577 was originally an unused registration series. In their drop-down of marques DVLA have no Bristol with this registration, but there is a "Bristol (BLMC)" - whatever that is - currently registered and licenced as JSC 577: Date of Liability 01 08 2011 Date of First Registration 03 09 1951 Year of Manufacture 1951 Cylinder Capacity (cc) 1971CC CO2 Emissions Not Available Fuel Type Petrol Export Marker Not Applicable Vehicle Status Licence Not Due Vehicle Colour GREEN Vehicle Type Approval How did they do that? Someone in any case must be colour blind..... And I wouldn't have thought the insurance can be valid either. By the way, I did respond to Eric in the end, but the thread had been closed! Censure, or simply sensible? If you are reading this Eric, no, I don't work at Bristol Cars, in fact not for any car (or part) manufacturer. But go on Eric, show us yer letter! |
|
|||
![]() Cooper Bristol
Lotus Bristol Warrior Bristol Mitchell Bristol Bristol Special ....the machine looks to me like a well engineered car in the spirit of the 50s and a worthy foil for the Bristol engine. Out of interest, how many supercharged Bristols were there pre 1960? How did they perform? Brett |
|
|||
![]() This was an error introduced, I understand, by DVLA when their records were computerised many years ago. I think that they did not understand the difference between the various manufacturers of Bristol cars, buses and trucks, and someone there thought that the car company had become part of the conglomerate that was the British Leyland Motor Company. As such many Bristol cars became incorrectly registered as Bristol (BLMC) instead of just Bristol.
If your car is so registered, you can if you wish return your V5 registration document to DVLA with a covering letter simply explaining that it is incorrect and they will issue a new form. There are instructions on the BOC website with details of where to write. I got a new V5 from Swansea a couple of years ago, so my 410 is now a happy Bristol again. There is no pressing need to change it, as it makes little practical difference to anything, but it is wrong when it says Bristol (BLMC) instead of Bristol. |
|
|||
![]() Not sure about invalid insurance mentioned above in #4 as most garages have trade policies covering everything.
But if DVLA have not been informed of brand-new chassis and body then two linked issues arise. It cannot retain the Bristol saloon's registration under DVLA's points system. It cannot retain Bristol saloon's nil-VED status. DVLA site gives very clear guide :- "Vehicles that have been rebuilt using a mix of new or used parts. In order to retain the original registration mark: cars and car-derived vans must use: The original unmodified chassis or unaltered bodyshell (i.e. body and chassis as one unit - monocoque); or a new chassis or monocoque bodyshell of the same specification as the original supported by evidence from the dealer or manufacturer (e.g. receipt). And two other major components from the original vehicle - ie suspension (front & back); steering assembly; axles (both); transmission or engine." Last edited by Gloster; 21-12-10 at 12:35 AM. |
|
|||
![]() Right, and this mistake created a lot of confusions for the owners as well.
|
|
|||
![]() I raced against Andrew in his special a good few years ago, I think it was painted silver back then.
It is a very pretty and well made car very much in the spirit of the 1950's golden age of British prototype specials. Really, it's a credit to the man. Oh and it's quite quick too. |